Contact Report Details | Data Online | Oregon Drinking Water Services

More information for this water system: SDWIS ID 3886
System Info :: Report for Lenders :: Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Contacts & Advisories :: Site Visits :: Public Notice
Coliform Summary :: Coliform Results :: Coliform Schedules :: LT2 :: GW/GWUDI Source Details :: Plan Review :: Annual Fee
Chemical Summary :: Chemical Results :: Chemical Schedules :: Chemical Schedule Summary :: Arsenic RAA :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS
Lead & Copper :: DBP Sample Sites :: FANLs :: MRDL :: GWR 4-Log :: Turbidity :: SWTR :: LRAA

Corrosion Control has moved to the Lead & Copper page.

Information for all water systems:
Water System Inventory :: Water System Surveys :: Outstanding Performers :: Treatment Plant Inspections :: Treatment :: Plan Reviews
Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Deficiencies :: System Scores :: Exceedances :: Public Notices :: Service Lines
Water Advisories :: Contact Reports :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS :: Post-wildfire VOCs :: Fluoride :: Certification List

OHA Drinking Water Services Contact Report Details
PWS ID:	OR41 00287
PWS Name:	EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD

Who Was Contacted and Phone:	Steve Blair (541) 434-5783
Contact Date:	11/01/2007
Contacted By:	KELLEY, KAREN (REGION 2)
Contact Method/Location:	Field

Assistance Type:	OTHER REGULATORY - REGULATORY ASSISTANCE
Reasons:	Lead or Copper Operations

Details:	SUMMARY: Lead and Copper Optimization Research and Efforts at EWEB. DETAILS: Casey Lyon and myself met with Steve Blair and Doug Wise from EWEB and their consultant, Kylee Dewis with HDR Inc. to review the 2007 lead investigative findings and report completed by HDR Inc. The findings and recommendations are documented in the Technical Memorandum and the Lead and Copper Review (see file). As a result, EWEB will be conducting an optimization evaluation to determine whether or not they are currently optimized or if they should proceed with researching ways to become optimized, specifically researching options for reducing pH variability in the distribution system and what the cost/benefit is around those options. Once complete, EWEB will present their findings to DHS. ACTION NEEDED: Continue communication with EWEB concerning optimization efforts and await evaluation findings.