OHA Drinking Water Services
Contact Report Details |
|||
| PWS ID: | OR41 01217 | ||
| PWS Name: | LATOURELL FALLS TOWNSHIP | ||
| Who Was Contacted: | Jay kemp | ||
| Contact Phone: | (Email address hidden) | ||
| Contact Date: | 12/10/2025 | ||
| Contacted By: | GEORGE PARISH, JENIFER (MULTNOMAH COUNTY) | ||
| Contact Method/Location: | |||
| Assistance Type: | SURVEY/DEFICIENCY FOLLOW-UP | ||
| Survey: | 08/13/2025 | ||
| Details: | Talked with Carrie at the state regarding this system DBP sampling requirements. They were getting samples in but were getting notices that they were out of compliance. They have to take a dual sample set at each of their two locations. That means that one location will have a sample that is analyzed for TTHM and HAA5, and the other location will have a sample that is analyzed for TTHM and HAA5. It can be a bit confusing, because they’re taking a sample at the high TTHM site and the high HAA5 site, but they really need to have those samples analyzed for both classes of chemicals. Based on their previously submitted data, they seem to have the required 2 sample sites. These are 43015 NE 2nd Street and 43005 NE 2nd Street. Again, these locations are presumed based on the data results submitted over the past few years. If these locations are not correct, then you’ll have to tell DMCE to update the sample locations. You can see their sample locations listed here. In 2024, they sampled at the two locations, but only sent in sample results for one of the two chems at each site. You can see that here. Click on the “DBPs and TOC” tab circled below in yellow highlighter. For 2025, they sampled twice at the same location? They should’ve taken one at each location, and had it analyzed for both chems. They have taken and submitted samples |
||