Contact Report Details | Data Online | Oregon Drinking Water Services

More information for this water system: SDWIS ID 3938
System Info :: Report for Lenders :: Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Contacts & Advisories :: Site Visits :: Public Notice
Coliform Summary :: Coliform Results :: Coliform Schedules :: LT2 :: GW/GWUDI Source Details :: Plan Review :: Annual Fee
Chemical Summary :: Chemical Results :: Chemical Schedules :: Chemical Schedule Summary :: Arsenic RAA :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS
Lead & Copper :: DBP Sample Sites :: FANLs :: MRDL :: GWR 4-Log :: Turbidity :: SWTR :: LRAA

Corrosion Control has moved to the Lead & Copper page.

Information for all water systems:
Water System Inventory :: Water System Surveys :: Outstanding Performers :: Treatment Plant Inspections :: Treatment :: Plan Reviews
Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Deficiencies :: System Scores :: Exceedances :: Public Notices :: Service Lines
Water Advisories :: Contact Reports :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS :: Post-wildfire VOCs :: Fluoride :: Certification List

OHA Drinking Water Services Contact Report Details
PWS ID:	OR41 00076
PWS Name:	BANKS WATER DEPARTMENT

Who Was Contacted and Phone:	David Noran (503) 640-2661
Contact Date:	01/12/2006
Contacted By:	SALIS, KARI (DWP)
Contact Method/Location:	Office

Assistance Type:	OTHER REGULATORY - REGULATORY ASSISTANCE
Reasons:	N/A N/A

Details:	SUMMARY: Waterline for blending well water with tank water DETAILS: David called asking about a requirement that a waterline be put in for blending of the well water and the water from the springs in the tank. He thought that I had required the city to install such a waterline, as a follow up to the sanitary survey in 2003. I reviewed the file and my memory, and I had made no such requirement. Also, I explained to him that the only requirement we have about this situation is that the city maintain free chlorine residual. The survey does not show this to be a problem, but even if it was, we would just require that it be fixed, but wouldnt specify exactly how it was to be done. David said that the city already installed this waterline (no plan review???), but due to a land use issue with the county, lawyers need to be involved. Since I did not require the waterline as he had thought, he will continue to work on the land use issues and an engineer for the city may contact us in the future. ACTION NEEDED: look in to need for plan review of this project (major or minor modification).