Contact Report Details | Data Online | Oregon Drinking Water Services

More information for this water system: SDWIS ID 3952
System Info :: Report for Lenders :: Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Contacts & Advisories :: Site Visits :: Public Notice
Coliform Summary :: Coliform Results :: Coliform Schedules :: LT2 :: GW/GWUDI Source Details :: Plan Review :: Annual Fee
Chemical Summary :: Chemical Results :: Chemical Schedules :: Chemical Schedule Summary :: Arsenic RAA :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS
Lead & Copper :: DBP Sample Sites :: FANLs :: MRDL :: GWR 4-Log :: Turbidity :: SWTR :: LRAA

Corrosion Control has moved to the Lead & Copper page.

Information for all water systems:
Water System Inventory :: Water System Surveys :: Outstanding Performers :: Treatment Plant Inspections :: Treatment :: Plan Reviews
Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Deficiencies :: System Scores :: Exceedances :: Public Notices :: Service Lines
Water Advisories :: Contact Reports :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS :: Post-wildfire VOCs :: Fluoride :: Certification List

OHA Drinking Water Services Contact Report Details
PWS ID:	OR41 00301
PWS Name:	HECETA WATER PEOPLES UTILITY DISTRICT

Who Was Contacted and Phone:	Scott Meyer (541) 997-2446
Contact Date:	03/29/2008
Contacted By:	PALLO, GARRET J (DWP)
Contact Method/Location:	Field

Assistance Type:	CIRCUIT RIDER ASSISTANCE
Reasons:	N/A N/A

Details:	SUMMARY: Provide assistance to City with spring intake problems DETAILS: HBH was contacted to provide assistance to the system on a number of issues. The first of which had to do with the inspection of and evaluation of an above ground section of piping at a creek crossing. The District is concerned that the structures and piping section are aging and could pose a major vulnerability for their system. They initially called for a structure evaluation of the supports on the piping section. We visited the site of piping crossing and performed a visual inspection of the frame supports. We utilized a plunge test to test the wood for rot and found some rot on at least one of the support structures. Other structures appeared to be in good conditions. We follow up with a report with our findings and opinion of the structure integrity of the crossing. We provide some potential solutions and rough cost figures for making improvements. ACTION NEEDED: Provide other assistance as required.