Contact Report Details | Data Online | Oregon Drinking Water Services

More information for this water system: SDWIS ID 3770
System Info :: Report for Lenders :: Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Contacts & Advisories :: Site Visits :: Public Notice
Coliform Summary :: Coliform Results :: Coliform Schedules :: LT2 :: GW/GWUDI Source Details :: Plan Review :: Annual Fee
Chemical Summary :: Chemical Results :: Chemical Schedules :: Chemical Schedule Summary :: Arsenic RAA :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS
Lead & Copper :: DBP Sample Sites :: FANLs :: MRDL :: GWR 4-Log :: Turbidity :: SWTR :: LRAA :: DW Source Protection

New! Visit our new Drinking Water Source Protection page.

Information for all water systems:
Water System Inventory :: Water System Surveys :: Outstanding Performers :: Treatment Plant Inspections :: Treatment :: Plan Reviews
Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Deficiencies :: System Scores :: Exceedances :: Public Notices :: Service Lines
Water Advisories :: Contact Reports :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS :: Post-wildfire VOCs :: Fluoride :: Certification List :: DW Source Protection

Introduction :: Data Search Options :: Water System Search :: DWS Home :: DWS Rules

Need help? Email Drinking Water Services for assistance.Staff/Partner Login

OHA Drinking Water Services Contact Report Details
PWS ID:	OR41 00611
PWS Name:	PAISLEY, CITY OF

Who Was Contacted and Phone:	Emma Villagrana (541) 943-3173
Contact Date:	04/10/2013
Contacted By:	PARRY, BETSY (REGION 2)
Contact Method/Location:	Office

Assistance Type:	ENFORCEMENT
Reasons:	Arsenic Arsenic

Details:	SUMMARY: Update to As treatment installation schedule under BCA enforcement DETAILS: Last I heard from city clerk Emma Villagrana, the arsenic treatment would be installed by about now, so I phoned for an update. She looked up the dates. April 12th is the expiration date on their current contract with the selected engineering firm (SHN Engineering), but ever since that firm came on board (in January 2013), they have provided Paisley a project schedule showing intermediary steps (40% design, review, 90%, putting construction out to bid, reviewing bids, etc.) and a projected date of August 13, 2013, for the treatment to be up and running. A considerable difference! The City is completing a contract amendment for the contracted engineer to extend it till after that projected completion date. Emma will fax Brad Daniels the signed amendment. It seems that the City continues to have a plan to meet their treatment requirements, but has missed deadlines on two different written and signed BCAs as well as several other estimates. ACTION NEEDED: The manager of DWSs Compliance and Enforcement unit will decide what is the appropriate action to take at this point.