Contact Report Details | Data Online | Oregon Drinking Water Services

More information for this water system: SDWIS ID 3770
System Info :: Report for Lenders :: Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Contacts & Advisories :: Site Visits :: Public Notice
Coliform Summary :: Coliform Results :: Coliform Schedules :: LT2 :: GW/GWUDI Source Details :: Plan Review :: Annual Fee
Chemical Summary :: Chemical Results :: Chemical Schedules :: Chemical Schedule Summary :: Arsenic RAA :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS
Lead & Copper :: DBP Sample Sites :: FANLs :: MRDL :: GWR 4-Log :: Turbidity :: SWTR :: LRAA

Corrosion Control has moved to the Lead & Copper page.

Information for all water systems:
Water System Inventory :: Water System Surveys :: Outstanding Performers :: Treatment Plant Inspections :: Treatment :: Plan Reviews
Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Deficiencies :: System Scores :: Exceedances :: Public Notices :: Service Lines
Water Advisories :: Contact Reports :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS :: Post-wildfire VOCs :: Fluoride :: Certification List

OHA Drinking Water Services Contact Report Details
PWS ID:	OR41 00611
PWS Name:	PAISLEY, CITY OF

Who Was Contacted and Phone:	Dwayne Young (541) 943-3375
Contact Date:	11/20/2009
Contacted By:	HENRY, ROBERT (DWP)
Contact Method/Location:	Field

Assistance Type:	CIRCUIT RIDER ASSISTANCE
Reasons:	N/A N/A

Details:	SUMMARY: Arsenic Issues Assistance DETAILS: HBH was contacted by the City due to high arsenic levels in one of its three municipal wells. The City provides water to approximately 300 people through 120 connections. The water system consists of two older wells and one newer well which is the source of the highest arsenic contamination. HBH composed source water sampling memo to allow for the system to sample proper chemical properties. Consulted EPA Decision Making Tree to determine proper means of Arsenic Treatment management. It was determined that a combination of treatment and blending would likely be the best course of action. The best treatment method would largely be cost-dependent. Contacted treatment plant manufacturers to determine possible budget amounts for treatment equipment and long term costs. I coordinated with TMG Services regarding cost estimates for an adsorption media filtration system. Long term operational costs for such a system were determined to be too burdensome for the community. Additional methods of arsenic compliance should be considered. ACTION NEEDED: Further assist City with selecting proper course of action.