Contact Report Details | Data Online | Oregon Drinking Water Services

More information for this water system: SDWIS ID 3900
System Info :: Report for Lenders :: Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Contacts & Advisories :: Site Visits :: Public Notice
Coliform Summary :: Coliform Results :: Coliform Schedules :: LT2 :: GW/GWUDI Source Details :: Plan Review :: Annual Fee
Chemical Summary :: Chemical Results :: Chemical Schedules :: Chemical Schedule Summary :: Arsenic RAA :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS
Lead & Copper :: DBP Sample Sites :: FANLs :: MRDL :: GWR 4-Log :: Turbidity :: SWTR :: LRAA

Corrosion Control has moved to the Lead & Copper page.

Information for all water systems:
Water System Inventory :: Water System Surveys :: Outstanding Performers :: Treatment Plant Inspections :: Treatment :: Plan Reviews
Alerts :: Violations :: Compliance & Enforcement :: Deficiencies :: System Scores :: Exceedances :: Public Notices :: Service Lines
Water Advisories :: Contact Reports :: Cyanotoxins :: PFAS :: Post-wildfire VOCs :: Fluoride :: Certification List

OHA Drinking Water Services Contact Report Details
PWS ID:	OR41 00657
PWS Name:	PORTLAND WATER BUREAU

Who Was Contacted and Phone:	Yone Akagi, et al (503) 823-7648
Contact Date:	06/09/2010
Contacted By:	SALIS, KARI (DWP)
Contact Method/Location:	Field

Assistance Type:	OTHER REGULATORY - REGULATORY ASSISTANCE
Reasons:	SWTR N/A

Details:	SUMMARY: Policy meeting with EPA DETAILS: Dave Leland and Kari Salis from DWP met with EPA (Mike Bissell, Marie Jennings, Harold Rogers, Fredianne Gray, Mike Finn, Stephanie Harris, Tony Barber, and Mary Schoen) and the Portland Water Bureau (Yone Akagi, Chris Wanner, Eddie Campbell, Dave Peters, Ann Richter, Melissa - admin, David Schaff) to discuss policy issues around the LT2 cryptosporidium treatment variance. EPA wanted to be sure that any underlying assumptions were clarified, and stated that their concern is protecting public health over the long term. PWB stated that they believe the criteria under which a variance would be granted had been set, and they hope to meet that criteria. Many details were discussed, as well as communications, and policy issues. The following day many participants took a tour of the Bull Run watershed and headworks, including a crypto sampling station where the filters are prepared for the lab. ACTION NEEDED: EPA Region 10 will write a letter discussing the key points of the meeting.